Erratum: medium‐long term effects of saline reclaimed water and regulated deficit irrigation on fruit quality of citrus

Journal of the Science Food and AgricultureVolume 101, Issue 14 p. 6147-6148 ErratumFree Access Erratum: medium-long term effects saline reclaimed water regulated deficit irrigation on fruit quality citrus This article corrects following: Medium-long Cristina Romero-Trigueros, Juan JA Cabañero, Pedro AN Tortosa, José MB Gambín, F Maestre-Valero, Emilio N Nicolás, Volume 100Issue 3Journal Agriculture pages: 1350-1357 First Published online: November 21, 2019 published: 06 October 2021 https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11434AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text full-text accessPlease review our Terms Conditions Use check box below share version article.I have read accept Wiley Online Library UseShareable LinkUse link a this with your friends colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat The Result section in abstract above has been updated. updated is as follows: RESULTS: Reclaimed mandarin, without restriction, influenced maturity index (MI) less than TW-FI, due increased titratable acidity (TA). Nevertheless, juice standards were satisfied. Regardless treatment (FI or RDI), trend towards increasing weight was also detected RW. In grapefruit, its rootstock (Citrus macrophylla) enhanced salinity resilience respect mandarin (‘Carrizo’ citrange) and, hence, MI not practically affected by RDI strategy stress (TW-RDI) similar degree both SSC TA fruit, affecting MI. did improve change significantly increased. combination strategies, RW-RDI, decreased only some years because greater mandarin. Tables 3 4 corrected are follows. Table 3. Soluble solid content (SSC, °Brix) Tiritable acid (TA, %) mid-term 2008–2011 period four treatments (TW-FI: transfer water-full irrigation, TW-RDI: water-regulated RW-FI: RW-RDI: irrigation). Each value average ± SE measurements performed 100 fruits per (25 replicate). Within each year, different letters indicate differences among ANOVA analysis followed HSD Tukey's test (P ≤ 0.05). MANDARIN GRAPEFRUIT Year Treatment (°Brix) (%) 2008 TW-FI 12.4 0.1a 0.80 0.04a 9.9 0.1c 1.98 0.13a TW-RDI 12.9 8.6 0.1b 1.79 0.10a RW-FI 13.4 0.0a 0.90 7.9 1.76 0.09a RW-RDI 13.3 0.03a 8.3 1.77 0.11a 2009 11.6 0.9a 0.05a 8.1 2.03 0.38a 12.0 1.0a 9.6 2.40 0.27a 11.3 1.6a 1.00 9.4 2.54 0.55a 11.9 1.1a 9.2 2.56 0.45a 2010 13.6 0.6a 9.8 0.6ab 2.51 0.21a 13.5 1.3a 10.6 1.3b 2.21 0.44a 13.1 0.5a 0.99 9.1 2.39 0.24a 13.2 10.0 1b 0.32a 2011 12.66 0.23ab 0.82 8.98 1.92 12.91 0.21ab 0.02a 8.81 0.12a 1.78 12.35 0.25a 0.87 9.79 0.12b 2.12 0.04b 13.22 0.18b 9.74 0.09b 2.13 0.06b Mid-term (2008–2011) 12.57 0.46a 0.83 9.20 0.43a 2.11 0.19a 12.83 0.65a 0.86 9.40 0.63a 2.05 12.54 0.59a 0.94 9.05 0.56a 2.20 0.23a 0.60a 0.92 9.31 0.57a 2.26 4. long-term 2012–2015 2012 12.38 0.27bc 8.85 2.01 12.90 0.16c 0.01a 9.16 0.19ab 2.04 0.08a 11.48 0.85 9.56 12.00 0.16ab 9.12 0.12ab 1.86 2013 11.87 0.76 8.33 1.83 13.61 0.29b 0.88 0.03b 9.38 0.39ab 1.99 0.15a 12.16 0.36a 0.97 0.02c 9.68 0.22b 12.72 0.24ab 0.02b 9.24 0.31ab 1.87 0.06a 2014 11.27 0.29a 0.79 8.39 1.72 12.06 0.28ab 9.41 0.14b 1.71 11.44 0.84 0.01ab 8.42 0.18a 1.80 12.39 0.20b 0.89 8.68 2015 0.31a 0.70 8.78 10.58 0.36bc 0.73 9.82 10.05 0.14ab 9.73 1.96 10.95 0.24c 0.78 0.03ab 9.96 Average Long-term 11.33 0.28a 0.77 8.59 12.29 0.27b 0.81 0.02ab 9.44 0.24b 1.93 11.28 9.35 0.15b 1.97 12.02 0.21b 9.25 REFERENCE 1Romero-Trigueros C, Cabañero JJA, Tortosa PAN, Gambín JMB, Maestre-Valero JF Nicolás EN, citrus. J Sci Agric 100: 1350– 1357 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10091. LibraryCASPubMedWeb Science®Google Scholar Volume101, Issue14November 2021Pages ReferencesRelatedInformation